Multimedia Art Museum, Moscow | Exhibitions | Unknown author, Peter Pavlov - Primrose part II
.
Ru

Primrose part II
Unknown author, Peter Pavlov

Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Novodevichy Convent. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Loubyanskaya Square. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. New rows. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. View of Kremlin from Cathedral of Christ the Savior.
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Triumphal Gate. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. View of Red Square. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Vladimir Gate. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Red Square. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Kremlin walls. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Dmitrovka Street. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Red Square. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. Tverskaya Square. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Peter Pavlov.
Moscow. The Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Unknown author.
Kiev. Saint Sophia Cathedral. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Unknown author.
Saint-Petersburg. View of Peterhof landing stage. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Unknown author.
Revel. General view. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Unknown author.
Riga. General view of the quay. 
1900–1910. 
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum Unknown author.
Riga. Cathedral. 
1900–1910.
“Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Novodevichy Convent. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Loubyanskaya Square. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. New rows. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. View of Kremlin from Cathedral of Christ the Savior. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Triumphal Gate. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. View of Red Square. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Vladimir Gate. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Red Square. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Kremlin walls. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Dmitrovka Street. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Red Square. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. Tverskaya Square. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Peter Pavlov. Moscow. The Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Unknown author. Kiev. Saint Sophia Cathedral. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Unknown author. Saint-Petersburg. View of Peterhof landing stage. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Unknown author. Revel. General view. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Unknown author. Riga. General view of the quay. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Unknown author. Riga. Cathedral. 1900–1910. “Moscow House of Photography” Museum

Moscow, 2.04.2008—2.05.2008

exhibition is over

The Apartments

Savvinskaya nab., 21

Share with friends

From the collection of the museum “Moscow House of Photography”

From the collection of the museum “Moscow House of Photography”

Close

For the press

The exhibition, bearing the metaphorical name «Primrose» or «Primula», represents a retrospective of various attempts, aimed at producing colored photographic images. This process began in Russia practically simultaneously with the discovery of the new medium itself — since the early 1850s and includes daguerreotypes painted with oil, black-and-white paper prints decorated with water-color, three-colored bromoil, hydrotypy, poligraphic print, carbro process, as well as the first strictly speaking color photo of the mid-20th century.

Three-colored bromoil — toned pastel prints by V. Ulitin, S. Shimanski, P. Klepikov, belong to the pictorial trend in Russian photography. These artists, working primarily in such genres as landscape and portrait, turned to color mainly to tone their prints (preferring ochre and terracotta hues), on some occasions they also used water-color. Color here was not supposed to stress and point out, but, on the contrary, to smooth and weaken the sharp contrasts of black-and-white images of nature, of female faces and of the nude body.

The experiments of the Russian chemist and photographer S. Prokudin-Gorski, who studied under Mendeleev and who worked with the Lumiere brothers, are quite unique in the history of the medium. He invented the «method of three-colored photography» — projecting black-and-white plates through color filters. In order to transfer the image from the photo-plate to paper one had to go through a very laborious process involving lithography. This is why only a handful of Prokudin-Gorski’s shots, among which we can name the portraits of F. Shaliapin and L. Tolstoy, were published during his lifetime.

The coloring technique, based on the traditional methods of craftsmen who added color into a certain contour design, has determined a whole independent trend in the history of photography. This is mass, provincial or home-made art. If in the 19th century, in the most important photographic studios, the shots would be painted, an approach inspired by classical engraving and water-color, using the photo print as a basis, in the 20th century this was practiced everywhere. The technique was used to make «post-card» landscapes and portraits. Photographers-craftsmen traveled around provincial Russia, shot black-and-white cards, transferred them into large format and painted them with aniline dyes. This type of likeness decorated the interiors of peasant houses and cemetery monuments. The same technique was also used by Soviet propaganda — colored photos were essential in creating official portraits of actors, heroes, chiefs. The latter included the most famous image of I. V. Stalin (by Shagin and Semionov). In this case photographic reality was idealized with the help of the techniques of painting.

The post-modernist aesthetic, approaching popular mentality with a large dose of irony, created the next stage, when this technique began to be used by «high» art. A remarkable example of this approach would be «Luriki» by Boris Mikhailov (late 1970s), turning mass kitsch inside out, followed by other works by R. Piatkovski, V. Stasiunas, etc.

Color photography per se exists in Russia since the middle of the 20th century. I. Shagin, V. Tarasevich, Y. Khalip, D. Baltermants, R. Diament — these photographers were masters of photo-report, turning to color film for documentary purposes. All of them were trained to set up a composition and to work with contrast on a black-and-white basis. This is why color, sometimes, interferes with the adequate perception of their work and breaks up the clear design of the shot. Nevertheless, the marvelous palette of these photographs, the warm tones combined with the soft focus make the Soviet colored photo-report a unique phenomenon in the world.

Only in the 1990s Russian photographers began to use color as an independent means of expression (S. Chilikov, A. Sliusarev, F. Infante, etc.). But even today both artists and photographers turn to the toned prints of pictorialism (A. Yerin, I. Makarevich) and to the traditional craftsman’s coloring techniques (V. and E. Samorodov), acknowledging the potential of the earlier experience in the field. So the retrospective of the Russian «Primrose» can be viewed as a journey through various techniques and genres, meanings and messages, mass practices and individual experiments.

With the support of

Volkswagen